Dimensity 8550 benchmarks put MediaTek’s newest upper mid-range chip at 2,429,134 on AnTuTu 11 and 6,283 on Geekbench 6 multi-core, according to NanoReview’s crowd aggregate. Announced on May 27, 2026, it is a focused refresh of the Dimensity 8500, not a ground-up redesign.
The headline change is artificial intelligence. MediaTek added an LLM Booster to the NPU 880 and support for Google Gemini Nano V3, so on-device language models can run on phones that cost far less than a flagship. The rest of the chip stays the same as the Dimensity 8500. This is a mid-range chip, not a rival to the Dimensity 9400 or 9500 flagships.
The Short Version
- Dimensity 8550 benchmarks: AnTuTu 11 total of 2,429,134 (CR), with a GPU subscore of 952,016.
- Geekbench 6 single-core of 1,558 and multi-core of 6,283 (CR), based on fewer than three samples each.
- Eight Cortex-A725 cores in a 1+3+4 layout, fastest at 3.4GHz, on a 4nm TSMC process.
- Mali-G720 MC8 graphics up to 1,508MHz, LPDDR5X memory, UFS 4.0 and 4.1 storage.
- NPU 880 with an LLM Booster and Gemini Nano V3 support, the main change over the Dimensity 8500.
- First phones include the Honor 600 Pro in China and the Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G, per GSMArena and NanoReview.
Dimensity 8550 benchmarks: The AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6 Numbers
Dimensity 8550 benchmarks start with AnTuTu 11, where NanoReview lists a total of 2,429,134 (CR). The breakdown is 612,932 for CPU, 952,016 for GPU, 394,012 for memory and 470,174 for user experience.
Geekbench 6 tells a quieter story. NanoReview lists a single-core score of 1,558, a multi-core score of 6,283 and a Compute score of 15,146 (CR). Each figure rests on fewer than three samples, so treat these Dimensity 8550 benchmarks as early and directional rather than settled.
Inside the Chip: CPU, GPU and Memory
The CPU behind the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks uses only Cortex-A725 cores, a design MediaTek calls All Big Core. One core runs at up to 3.4GHz, three more at up to 3.2GHz, and four at up to 2.2GHz. The layout is 1+3+4, with 6MB of L3 cache.
Graphics come from the Arm Mali-G720 MC8, which NanoReview lists as Mali-G720 MP8. The GPU runs at up to 1,508MHz and delivers about 3,088.4 gigaflops, according to NanoReview.
Memory is LPDDR5X, up to 9,600Mbps on MediaTek’s page and 4,800MHz on NanoReview, with up to 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth and support for up to 24GB. Storage covers UFS 4.0 and 4.1, and the chip is built on TSMC’s 4nm process, listed as N4P, with a 6W sustained power limit. These parts shape what Dimensity 8550 benchmarks can show in real phones.
How It Stacks Up Against the Dimensity 8450
The closest comparison is the Dimensity 8450, the chip below it in MediaTek’s upper mid-range line. Dimensity 8550 benchmarks run about 20 percent ahead on AnTuTu 11, at about 2,429,000 against about 2,016,000 (CR) on NanoReview’s comparison page. The GPU carries much of that gap.
The CPU story is narrower. The 8450 runs one Cortex-A725 at 3.25GHz, three at 3.0GHz and four at 2.1GHz, a small clock lift, not a new architecture. Its AnTuTu CPU subscore actually runs higher in NanoReview’s table, so the CPU lead should not be overstated.
Memory bandwidth also favors the newer chip, at 76.8 GB/s against 68.2 GB/s on NanoReview, about 13 percent higher. The GPU is a Mali-G720 MP8 on the 8550 against a Mali-G720 MP7 on the 8450, with about 16 percent higher GPU frequency.
The AI Story: Gemini Nano V3 Comes Downmarket
The real news here is not clock speed. MediaTek’s official page says the Dimensity 8550 pairs the NPU 880 with an LLM Booster and support for Google Gemini Nano V3, plus Diffusion Transformer support, speculative decoding and INT4 quantization. GSMArena reported the same change on May 27, 2026, calling the chip a refresh of the Dimensity 8500.
That support comes with a condition buyers reading the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks should know. Reports from TweakTown and Android Authority note Google asks for at least 12GB of RAM for Gemini Nano features, so this chip alone does not unlock on-device AI.
Phones That Use the Dimensity 8550
GSMArena reported that the first phone to use the Dimensity 8550 is the Chinese version of the Honor 600 Pro, the launch device behind the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks. NanoReview lists the Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global) as the phone behind its AnTuTu 11 total of 2,429,134, The list is short because the chip is new, and buyers should check the exact model and region first, since variants can differ.
Connectivity in Daily Use
The chip behind the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks supports 5G-Advanced on sub-6GHz bands, with download speeds up to 5,170Mbps listed on NanoReview. MediaTek lists Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.4, while NanoReview lists Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 6.0, so the sources differ there.
In practice, the modem matters most to buyers on fast sub-6GHz 5G networks, which cover most markets outside the United States. Buyers in Bangladesh and South Asia will see no daily benefit from extra modem headroom, since mmWave networks are not part of daily use there. The chip’s value there is speed, efficiency and AI, not exotic connectivity.
Battery: What the 91 Score Does and Does Not Mean
NanoReview gives the Dimensity 8550 a battery life rating of 91 in its Dimensity 8550 benchmarks page, its highest category score for this chip. That number reflects the chip’s efficiency profile on a 4nm process, not a measured run time for any phone.
Battery life depends on the phone around the chip: battery size, display, software and signal strength all matter more than the silicon name. No battery winner can be named here, because battery life depends on the phone, not the chip alone.
Dimensity 8550 benchmarks in Context: Who Should Care
Dimensity 8550 benchmarks matter most to buyers choosing an upper mid-range phone in late 2026. An AnTuTu 11 total near 2.43 million and a Geekbench 6 multi-core score near 6,283 place this chip well above budget silicon
Gamers should weigh the GPU figures more than the CPU ones, since the Mali-G720 MC8 and the strong AnTuTu GPU subscore point to smooth play in optimized titles. MediaTek’s 120 frames per second target applies to HyperEngine-optimized games, not every title. The Dimensity 9400 and 9500 series sit in a different class, so judge the 8550 on its own terms.
Dimensity 8550 benchmarks: Quick Answers
What are the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks? NanoReview lists an AnTuTu 11 total of 2,429,134 (CR), a Geekbench 6 single-core score of 1,558 and a multi-core score of 6,283 (CR), with a Geekbench 6 Compute score of 15,146 (CR).
Is the Dimensity 8550 a flagship chip? No. It is an upper mid-range chip announced on May 27, 2026, on a 4nm process, below the Dimensity 9400 and 9500 flagship series.
What is new over the Dimensity 8500 in the Dimensity 8550 benchmarks? The main change is AI support. The Dimensity 8550 adds an LLM Booster to the NPU 880 and support for Google Gemini Nano V3, while the CPU, GPU and memory setup stays the same.
Which phones use the Dimensity 8550? GSMArena names the Honor 600 Pro in China first, and NanoReview ties its AnTuTu 11 total to the Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global).
Does Gemini Nano V3 work on any phone with this chip? Not automatically. Reports note Google asks for at least 12GB of RAM and qualified software, so check the phone’s memory first.
The Takeaway
The Dimensity 8550 benchmarks point to a smart refresh with one clear idea: bring on-device AI to phones that cost less than flagships. Its totals are strong for the upper mid-range, its GPU leads its own score sheet
Buyers should still wait for more Geekbench samples and real phone reviews before treating any single score as final. If you want AI features and strong gaming in an upper mid-range phone, a device with this chip deserves a place on your shortlist.
Sources
- NanoReview, MediaTek Dimensity 8550 specs and benchmarks, accessed October 31, 2026 (CR).
- MediaTek, Dimensity 8550 official product page, accessed October 31, 2026 (MF).
- GSMArena, MediaTek unveils Dimensity 8550 with LLM Booster and support for Gemini Nano V3, May 27, 2026.
- NanoReview, Dimensity 8550 vs Dimensity 8450 tests and benchmarks (CR).
Score methodology: Lab-reviewer (LR) scores come from named outlets’ controlled testing. Crowd (CR) scores come from aggregator databases such as NanoReview that pool user-submitted results and are less controlled. Company (MF) numbers are manufacturer claims. This article treats LR as strongest, CR as directional and MF as attributed.
