Exynos 2400 benchmarks put Samsung’s 2024 flagship chip at 2,046,435 on AnTuTu 11 and 6,826 on Geekbench 6 multi-core, according to NanoReview’s crowd aggregate. Announced on January 17, 2024, it powers the Galaxy S24 series outside the United States, and later returned in the Galaxy S25 FE and the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE.
The chip is Samsung’s first flagship silicon built around the Xclipse 940 GPU, a graphics unit based on AMD RDNA 3 architecture. That GPU, plus a 10-core CPU led by a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.21GHz, is what separates the Exynos 2400 from the mid-range Exynos chips that came before it.
The Short Version
- Exynos 2400 benchmarks: AnTuTu 11 total of 2,046,435 (CR), GPU subscore 637,772.
- Geekbench 6 single-core 2,115, multi-core 6,826 (CR), 38 tests.
- Ten cores in a 1+2+3+4 layout, fastest at 3.21GHz, 4nm Samsung process.
- Xclipse 940 GPU, RDNA 3, up to 1,095MHz, 768 shaders.
- Powers the Galaxy S24, S24 Plus, S25 FE and Z Flip 7 FE.
- Near-twin Exynos 2400e differs only in prime-core clock speed.
Exynos 2400 benchmarks: The AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6 Numbers
Exynos 2400 benchmarks start with AnTuTu 11, where NanoReview lists a total of 2,046,435 (CR): 698,933 for CPU, 637,772 for GPU, 301,201 for memory and 408,529 for user experience. The CPU subscore leads by about 61,000 points.
Geekbench 6 gives a single-core score of 2,115 and a multi-core score of 6,826 (CR), based on 38 tests. The Compute score, which measures the GPU under Vulkan, is 16,273 from 29 tests. These Exynos 2400 benchmarks are crowd-aggregate figures from real phones, not controlled lab results.
One quirk deserves a plain statement. The headline AnTuTu 11 total of 2,046,435 sits below the Galaxy S25 FE score of 2,087,886 and above the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE score of 1,841,283. Scores vary by phone, cooling and software, so no single phone score equals the chip score.
Inside the Chip: CPU, GPU and Memory
The CPU uses ten cores in a 1+2+3+4 layout: one Cortex-X4 prime core at up to 3.21GHz, two Cortex-A720 cores at 2.9GHz, three more at 2.6GHz and four Cortex-A520 efficiency cores at 1.95GHz. It uses ARMv9.2-A, 8MB of L3 cache and a 6W sustained power limit, built on Samsung’s 4nm process.
Graphics come from the Samsung Xclipse 940, based on AMD RDNA 3 and running at up to 1,095MHz. NanoReview lists 768 shaders and 3,406.8 GFlops, with Vulkan 1.3, OpenCL 3.0 and DirectX 12.1 support. The RDNA 3 base brings hardware ray tracing to a Samsung flagship chip.
Memory is LPDDR5X at 4,200MHz, up to 68.2 Gb/s of bandwidth and 24GB, while storage covers UFS 3.1 and UFS 4.0. The chip supports displays up to 3840×2400, cameras up to a single 320MP sensor, 8K capture at 30 frames per second and 8K playback at 60. These parts shape what Exynos 2400 benchmarks can show in real phones.
Gaming and Graphics: Xclipse 940 in Practice
Gaming is the weaker half of the Exynos 2400 benchmarks score sheet. NanoReview rates gaming at 59, against 75 for CPU and 86 for battery life, for an overall score of 73. The 3DMark figures back that up: Solar Bay scores 8,302 at 32 frames per second, Steel Nomad Light scores 1,769 at 13 frames per second with 67% stability and Wild Life Extreme scores 3,812 at 22 frames per second with 57% stability.
PCMark 3.0, which measures everyday workloads, gives 17,172 across three phones tested, with photo editing leading at 35,055. Daily work and photo tasks run comfortably, while sustained heavy gaming is where it gives ground.
Exynos 2400 vs Exynos 2400e: One Clock Speed Apart
Samsung sells a near-twin, the Exynos 2400e, in the Galaxy S24 FE. The only clock difference is the prime core: the 2400e runs its Cortex-X4 at 3.11GHz instead of 3.21GHz, with every other core unchanged. The headline gap is small, about 3.5% on AnTuTu 11 and 6.7% on Geekbench 6 multi-core, so the Exynos 2400 benchmarks lead is real but narrow.
The odd result sits in the graphics numbers. The 2400e posts a higher AnTuTu GPU subscore, 670,589 against 637,772, and a higher Geekbench 6 Compute score, 16,611 against 16,273, even though both chips use the same Xclipse 940 GPU. That is a crowd-aggregate quirk, not a hardware difference. The 2400 still leads on Solar Bay, 8,302 against 7,699, and on PCMark, 17,172 against 16,227.
Phones That Run the Exynos 2400
Four phones carry this chip on NanoReview’s list. The Galaxy S25 FE leads at 2,087,886 on AnTuTu v11, followed by the Galaxy S24 (Exynos) at 2,029,835 and the Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) at 2,007,558. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE trails at 1,841,283, about 10% below the headline, which fits a smaller folding body.
Region decides which chip a Galaxy buyer gets. The Exynos 2400 ships in the Galaxy S24 series across Europe, India and many other markets, while the United States and China get the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Buyers checking Exynos 2400 benchmarks should confirm the exact model and region first, since the chip changes with the market.
Connectivity in Daily Use
The Exynos 5400 modem supports 5G with downloads up to 12,100 Mbps and uploads up to 3,670 Mbps, per NanoReview, plus Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3 and full satellite navigation.
In practice, the modem matters most to buyers on fast sub-6GHz 5G networks, which cover most markets outside the US. The download ceiling is about 25.5% higher than the Exynos 2400e modem, but few owners will see speeds near either ceiling. Buyers in Bangladesh and South Asia will see no daily benefit from the extra headroom.
Battery: What the 86 Score Does and Does Not Mean
NanoReview gives the Exynos 2400 a battery life rating of 86 on its Exynos 2400 benchmarks page, its highest category score. That reflects the chip’s efficiency profile on a 4nm process, not a measured run time for any phone.
Battery life depends on the phone around the chip: battery size, display, software and signal strength matter more. No battery winner can be named here, because battery life depends on the phone, not the chip alone.
Exynos 2400 benchmarks in Context: Who Should Care
Exynos 2400 benchmarks matter most to two groups in late 2026: buyers weighing a used or discounted Galaxy S24, and buyers choosing the Galaxy S25 FE new. An AnTuTu 11 total near 2.05 million and a Geekbench 6 multi-core score near 6,826 place it in the flagship class of its generation.
Gamers should weigh the GPU figures more than the CPU ones, since the gaming rating of 59 and the middling 3DMark stability figures point to throttling. The Xclipse 940 still brings ray tracing to Samsung phones.
Exynos 2400 benchmarks: Quick Answers
What are the Exynos 2400 benchmarks? NanoReview lists AnTuTu 11 total of 2,046,435 (CR), Geekbench 6 single-core of 2,115 and multi-core of 6,826 (CR), with a Compute score of 16,273 (CR).
Which phones use the Exynos 2400? The Galaxy S25 FE, Galaxy S24 (Exynos), Galaxy S24 Plus (Exynos) and Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, according to NanoReview. The Galaxy S24 FE uses the Exynos 2400e instead.
Is the Exynos 2400 better than the Exynos 2400e? Slightly. It leads by about 3.5% on AnTuTu 11 and 6.7% on Geekbench 6 multi-core, because its prime core runs 100MHz faster. The 2400e oddly leads on the AnTuTu GPU subscore and Compute score, a crowd-aggregate quirk, not a hardware gap.
Does the Exynos 2400 support ray tracing? Yes. Its Xclipse 940 GPU is based on AMD RDNA 3 architecture, and it scores 8,302 on 3DMark Solar Bay, the ray tracing test.
Is the Exynos 2400 still worth buying in 2026? For a used or discounted Galaxy S24, yes. For a new phone, the Galaxy S25 FE carries the same chip with newer software support, so check the price gap first.
The Takeaway
The Exynos 2400 benchmarks describe a solid 2024 flagship that still holds up in 2026. Its CPU leads its own score sheet, its modem and camera support are generous, and its gaming figures are honest. The quirks are stated here because they are part of the record, not because they change the verdict.
Judge the chip by the phone around it. A Galaxy S24 at the right price is a strong buy, the S25 FE is the safer new purchase, and the Z Flip 7 FE trades raw scores for the folding form.
Sources
- NanoReview, Samsung Exynos 2400 specs and benchmarks, accessed November 1, 2026 (CR).
- 91mobiles, Samsung Exynos 2400 specifications and benchmark, accessed November 1, 2026.
Score methodology: Lab-reviewer (LR) scores come from named outlets’ controlled testing. Crowd (CR) scores come from aggregator databases such as NanoReview that pool user-submitted results and are less controlled. Company (MF) numbers are manufacturer claims. This article treats LR as strongest, CR as directional and MF as attributed.
