Google Tensor G6 benchmarks put Google’s newest flagship chip at 1,933,536 on AnTuTu 11 and 7,563 on Geekbench 6 multi-core, according to NanoReview’s crowd aggregate. Announced on August 12, 2026, the 3nm chip powers the whole Pixel 11 line.
The headline split is unusual. CPU performance scores 81 on NanoReview’s scale while gaming performance scores only 30. That split defines the chip: strong everyday speed and AI, with a graphics unit that trails every rival flagship.
The Short Version
- Google Tensor G6 benchmarks: AnTuTu 11 total of 1,933,536 (CR), GPU subscore of only 288,736.
- Geekbench 6 single-core 2,755 and multi-core 7,563 (CR), based on only 6 samples.
- Seven custom C1 cores in a 1+4+2 layout, fastest at 4.11GHz, 3nm TSMC.
- PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 graphics at 1,286MHz with 768 shaders, the weak point of the chip.
- NPU present with no published TOPS figure; Google claims a 50% faster AI engine (MF).
- In the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro Fold.
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks: The AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6 Numbers
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks start with AnTuTu 11, where NanoReview lists a total of 1,933,536 (CR) for the Pixel 11 Pro XL. The breakdown is 876,037 for CPU, 288,736 for GPU, 304,202 for memory and 464,561 for user experience. The CPU subscore carries the total, while the GPU subscore is the lowest of any flagship chip in this batch.
Geekbench 6 tells a quieter story. NanoReview lists a single-core score of 2,755, a multi-core score of 7,563 and a Compute score of 6,216 (CR). Each figure rests on a very thin sample: 6 tests for the CPU scores and only 3 tests for Compute. Treat these Google Tensor G6 benchmarks as early and directional rather than settled.
The GPU is the weak point in the Google Tensor G6 benchmarks. NanoReview rates gaming performance at 30 against 81 for CPU performance, and the AnTuTu GPU subscore of 288,736 makes up only about 15 percent of the total. Google built a CPU-and-AI-first chip, and buyers who care about gaming should know that.
Remember that sustained performance depends on each phone’s cooling design, software tuning and ambient temperature as much as on the chip itself. A thicker phone with a better vapour chamber can outperform a thinner phone running the same silicon.
Inside the Chip: CPU, GPU and Memory
The CPU uses seven custom Arm cores in a 1+4+2 layout: one C1-Ultra at up to 4.11GHz, four C1-Pro at up to 3.38GHz and two C1-Pro at up to 2.65GHz. The instruction set is ARMv9.3-A with 8MB of L3 cache, model number GS601, built on TSMC’s 3nm process.
Graphics come from the Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536, running at up to 1,286MHz with 768 shaders and 1,975.3 gigaflops of compute, supporting Vulkan 1.4 and OpenCL 3.0. The shader count is unchanged from the Tensor G5, so the gains come from clock speed, not a wider design.
Memory is LPDDR5X at 4,266MHz with up to 68.2 Gb/s of bandwidth and up to 16GB. Storage covers UFS 4.0 and 4.1, the display ceiling is 3840 x 2400, and the camera ceiling is a single 200MP sensor with 8K30 video. These parts shape what Google Tensor G6 benchmarks can show in real phones.
How It Stacks Up Against the Tensor G5
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks run about 25 percent ahead of the Tensor G5 on AnTuTu 11, at 1,933,536 against 1,549,798 (CR). The CPU subscore is about 19 percent higher, and the GPU subscore about 58 percent higher, though it starts from a low base.
Geekbench 6 shows the same pattern. Single-core rises about 20 percent, from 2,305 to 2,755, and multi-core rises about 25 percent, from 6,054 to 7,563. Compute jumps about 51 percent, from 4,116 to 6,216, but the G6 figure rests on only 3 tests against 7 for the G5.
The Pixels That Run It
NanoReview ties its AnTuTu 11 total to the Pixel 11 Pro XL, the phone behind the Google Tensor G6 benchmarks headline total. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold scores slightly higher, at 1,951,408, and the Pixel 11 Pro sits at 1,925,523. The base Pixel 11 has no AnTuTu score listed yet.
The Pixel 11 starts at $899 in the US on the Google Store, with a $200 discount until November 8, 2026. Google promises 7 years of OS and security updates. No European price was verified for this article.
The AI Story: What the NPU Does
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks do not measure AI directly, and NanoReview gives no TOPS figure for the NPU, so the AI story rests on Google’s own claims. The Google Store says the Tensor G6 has a 50 percent faster AI engine than the Tensor G5, powering 30x Super Zoom and Gemini Intelligence.
Treat that as a company claim, not an independent result. The chip ships in every Pixel 11 phone, so every buyer gets the same AI hardware, and NanoReview lists the NPU as present with no performance figure attached.
Connectivity in Daily Use
The modem is a MediaTek M90, a change from the Exynos 5400c in the Tensor G5, with 5G downloads up to 12,000 Mbps listed on NanoReview. Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6.0 are supported.
The modem upgrade matters most to buyers on fast US 5G networks. Most buyers in Bangladesh, South Asia, and much of Europe on sub-6GHz 5G or LTE plans will see no daily benefit from the extra headroom, and the 12,000 Mbps figure is a theoretical peak, not a daily speed.
Battery: What the 91 Score Does and Does Not Mean
NanoReview gives the Tensor G6 a battery life rating of 91 on its Google Tensor G6 benchmarks page. That number reflects the chip’s efficiency profile on a 3nm process, not a measured run time for any phone.
Battery life depends on the phone around the chip: battery size, display, software and signal strength matter more than the silicon name. Google claims 30-plus hours for the Pixel 11, a claim about the phone, not the chip. No battery winner can be named here, because battery life depends on the phone, not the chip alone.
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks in Context: Who Should Care
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks matter most to buyers choosing a Pixel 11 phone in late 2026. An AnTuTu 11 total near 1.93 million and a Geekbench 6 multi-core score near 7,563 place this chip below the fastest Android flagships on graphics, while its CPU scores sit closer to the pack.
Gamers should weigh the GPU figures more than the CPU ones in the Google Tensor G6 benchmarks: the AnTuTu GPU subscore of 288,736 and the Compute score of 6,216 both trail rival flagships by a wide margin. Buyers who mostly browse, photograph and use AI features will notice the CPU and NPU more.
Google Tensor G6 benchmarks: Quick Answers
What are the Google Tensor G6 benchmarks? NanoReview lists an AnTuTu 11 total of 1,933,536 (CR), Geekbench 6 single-core of 2,755 and multi-core of 7,563 (CR), and a Compute score of 6,216 (CR).
Is the Tensor G6 good for gaming? Not by flagship standards. NanoReview rates gaming performance at 30, against 81 for CPU performance, and the AnTuTu GPU subscore of 288,736 is the lowest of any flagship chip in this batch.
How much faster is the Tensor G6 than the Tensor G5? About 25 percent on AnTuTu 11 and Geekbench 6 multi-core, about 20 percent on single-core, per NanoReview’s crowd aggregates. The Compute gap of about 51 percent rests on only 3 tests.
Which phones use the Tensor G6? The Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. NanoReview lists AnTuTu v11 scores for the Pro Fold, Pro XL and Pro, but none for the base Pixel 11.
Does the Tensor G6 have 3DMark scores? Not on NanoReview, which lists no 3DMark or PCMark scores for the Tensor G6, while the Tensor G5 page lists both.
The Takeaway
The Google Tensor G6 benchmarks describe a CPU-and-AI-first chip with a weak GPU. Its CPU scores are strong, its AI engine is the story Google wants told, and its graphics trail every rival flagship.
Buyers should wait for more Geekbench samples and real phone reviews before treating any single score as final. If you want a Pixel for camera, software and AI, the chip delivers. If gaming leads your shortlist, look elsewhere.
Sources
- NanoReview, Google Tensor G6 specs and benchmarks, accessed November 1, 2026 (CR).
- NanoReview, Google Tensor G5 specs and benchmarks, accessed November 1, 2026 (CR).
- Google Store, Google Pixel 11 product page, accessed November 1, 2026 (MF).
Score methodology: Lab-reviewer (LR) scores come from named outlets’ controlled testing. Crowd (CR) scores come from aggregator databases such as NanoReview that pool user-submitted results and are less controlled. Company (MF) numbers are manufacturer claims. This article treats LR as strongest, CR as directional and MF as attributed.
